The account comes from six people with knowledge of the events that took place...

CNN Climate 1 year ago

The account comes from six people with knowledge of the events that took place as President Donald Trump falsely claimed the LA fires were a result of the state's water policies, and demanded more water be sent south. The people who spoke with CNN were granted anonymity because they were not authorized to speak about the events. They also feared retaliation from the Trump administration. The new details serve as a peek into the inner workings of the chaotic second Trump administration in its first weeks as it sparred with California Gov. Gavin Newsom over the response to the Los Angeles fires. A power outage — and the fact that at least one of the DOGE representatives was not yet an employee of the federal government and therefore was not allowed near the pump controls — ultimately threw a wrench in the plan to engage the pumps in late January. But a few days later, in a show of authority that superseded California's own water policy, Trump ordered the US Army Corps to open two dams in central California, which ultimately flooded farmland in the San Joaquin Valley with 2.2 billion gallons of fresh water. State water experts previously told CNN it was a regrettable waste as farmers look anxiously toward the state's dry season. Water experts told CNN after the incident the water release was wasteful and put farmers at risk of running out of water this summer and fall. The water flowed into the dry Tulare lakebed and soaked into the ground. The Interior Department and Bureau of Reclamation declined to comment for this story. A spokesperson for DOGE and the two DOGE representatives involved did not respond to CNN's requests for comment. Tap the link in @cnnpolitics's bio for more. 📷: Patrick T. Fallon/AFP/Getty Images; Eric Thayer/AP; DOGE/X; Gallo Images/Orbital Horizon/Copernicus Sentinel Data/Getty Images

layersDaily Sustainability Digest

Published about 11 hours ago



Sustainable construction is redefining its priorities as environmental sustainability in construction shifts from technology-driven solutions to place-based, resource-conscious design. Across climate-stressed regions, the focus is turning to whole life carbon assessment, lifecycle assessment and life cycle cost as essential tools to measure and control the carbon footprint of construction. Developments in the US Mountain West are embedding low carbon design principles, addressing drought and urban growth constraints through sustainable building design that integrates water efficiency, green infrastructure and renewable building materials into district-scale masterplans.

In India, reconstruction efforts in landslide-prone regions expose the financial and environmental risks of neglecting embodied carbon in materials and sustainable building practices. Resilient schemes now apply eco-design for buildings and life cycle thinking in construction to avoid repeating failures, reinforcing that whole life carbon and embodied carbon metrics must guide future housing strategies.

Urban housing demonstrates the growing viability of net zero carbon buildings and low carbon construction materials, supported by sustainable material specification and green building products that deliver measurable performance improvements. Investors are tying building lifecycle performance to life cycle cost benefits, transforming sustainable design into a mainstream financial metric rather than a niche initiative.

Corporate campuses and mixed-use retrofits are consolidating a retrofit-first logic. The drive to decarbonise existing stock is aligning with circular economy in construction principles, end-of-life reuse in construction and circular construction strategies that minimise demolition and embodied carbon losses. Achieving net zero whole life carbon and BREEAM V7 certification is becoming the benchmark for responsible modernisation, integrating resource efficiency in construction and environmental product declarations (EPDs) into procurement systems.

Uneven policy frameworks and material supply constraints are prompting adaptive low-impact construction strategies that incorporate circular economy thinking and carbon footprint reduction across borders. Designs must allow flexibility to meet differing lifecycle assessment standards while maintaining alignment with global goals for decarbonising the built environment.

Future-ready sustainability depends on district-level efficiency, hazard-aware land planning and community-led stewardship. Success belongs to those who demonstrate environmental sustainability at the level that truly counts—the whole place—delivering net zero carbon outcomes through sustainable construction that unites performance, resilience and economic viability.

Show More

camera_altFeatured Instagram Posts:

Get your opinion heard:

Whole Life Carbon is a platform for the entire construction industry—both in the UK and internationally. We track the latest publications, debates, and events related to whole life guidance and sustainability. If you have any enquiries or opinions to share, please do get in touch.

Let's chat!
Avatar

WLC Assistant

Ask me about sustainability

Hi! I'm your Whole Life Carbon assistant. I can help you learn about sustainability, carbon assessment, and navigate our resources. How can I help you today?