Registros de contaminación del aire y emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero no toman en cuenta la quema de plástico. Pero un estudio de 2023 liderado por Eri Saikawa, del proyecto Ecolectivos, estima que la quema de basura plástica en Guatemala, incluyendo la montaña en Santa María Xalapán, podría producir “incrementos considerables” de esas emisiones.
Los resultados son alarmantes pero también sugieren que la quema de basura plástica es un problema mejorable, dijo Saikawa de la Universidad de Emory. “Simplemente creando acceso a recolección de basura, podríamos prevenir estas emisiones y mejorar la salud humana y del ecosistema.”
Muchos guatemaltecos queman plástico para avivar los fuegos de su cocina o manejar la basura que se desborda, muchas veces sin saber que hacerlo libera microplásticos, compuestos carcinógenos, disruptores hormonales, y otros químicos tóxicos que puede afectar negativamente la salud humana.
Lean más acerca de esto en nuestra página web, en los hipervínculos del perfil.
✍️ @lizamgross
📸 Soila Elizabeth Cruz
Residents of low-income Indigenous Xinca villages in Guatemala who lack garbage-collection services are forced to burn their discarded plastic.
Guatemala imported over 1.2 million tons of household plastics in a decade, with Chinese imports nearly tripling.
Downtown Jalapa now hosts several stores devoted to selling plastic wares from China.
Pungent plastic chemical odors fill Super China, where shelves overflow with mass-produced plastic goods.
Ecolectivos participants like Soila Elizabeth Cruz came up with strategies like community cleanups to reduce their need to burn plastic.
Many women who worked with Ecolectivos still collect and sort items to recycle. But what’s really needed, they say, is a collection center for trash and recyclables.
As hard as Ecolectivos participants are working to reduce their need to burn plastic, there is still so much plastic waste, many people feel they have no choice but to burn it.
Sustainable construction is moving from voluntary ambition to financial, regulatory and insurance-led discipline. More than 830 companies and investors have committed to TNFD nature-risk disclosure, including investors with $26trn under management, signalling that environmental sustainability in construction, biodiversity protection and land-use impacts are becoming core tests for finance. Developers pursuing net zero carbon buildings, net zero whole life carbon and credible sustainable building design will need stronger whole life carbon assessment, lifecycle assessment and life cycle cost evidence to prove building lifecycle performance and manage the carbon footprint of construction.
Physical climate risk is reshaping design assumptions. Severe drought in southern England has triggered tougher Environment Agency scrutiny of corporate water use, creating direct pressure on contractors, product manufacturers and materials suppliers. Satellite evidence of uneven urban subsidence, with parts of Jakarta sinking by up to 7cm a year, shows why sustainable urban development, green infrastructure, low carbon design and resilient sustainable architecture require street-level ground, drainage and climate-risk data. Insurers are retreating from some climate exposures, making sustainability a condition of cover, finance and permission to build.
Materials transparency is becoming a competitive advantage. A new timber pricing and supply-chain data platform for UK staircase manufacturers, housebuilders and specifiers reflects rising demand for renewable building materials, green building materials, green building products and low embodied carbon materials. Better data can support sustainable material specification, environmental product declarations (epds), embodied carbon in materials and substitution away from carbon-intensive steel and concrete. It strengthens circular economy in construction, resource efficiency in construction, end-of-life reuse in construction and circular construction strategies by making low carbon construction materials commercially measurable rather than merely desirable.
Policy pressure is tightening across the built environment. Business and energy groups’ defence of the EU carbon market matters for decarbonising the built environment, especially cement, steel and other embodied carbon-heavy inputs. BREEAM, BREEAM v7, eco-design for buildings, sustainable design, low-impact construction, energy-efficient buildings and sustainable building practices are increasingly tied to whole life carbon, embodied carbon, net zero carbon, carbon footprint reduction and life cycle thinking in construction. Green construction, eco-friendly construction and carbon neutral construction will be judged less by marketing claims and more by disclosure, insurance viability, water resilience, material data and verified reductions in the environmental impact of construction.
Whole Life Carbon is a platform for the entire construction industry—both in the UK and internationally. We track the latest publications, debates, and events related to whole life guidance and sustainability. If you have any enquiries or opinions to share, please do
get in touch.
Let's chat!
WLC Assistant
Ask me about sustainability
Hi! I'm your Whole Life Carbon assistant. I can help you learn about sustainability, carbon assessment, and navigate our resources. How can I help you today?