On a Tuesday morning in late August, Rosemary Penwarden protested climate...

Inside Climate News 2 years ago

On a Tuesday morning in late August, Rosemary Penwarden protested climate inaction in New Zealand. She sat down during rush hour traffic on the main road linking Wellington Airport to the capital’s city center. The next day, Penwarden was in Arohata’s women’s prison just north of Wellington. She had been charged with endangering transport—a serious criminal offense that carries a maximum penalty of 12 years imprisonment. According to Kris Gledhill, a professor of law at Auckland University of Technology, the current charge is disproportionate to the offense. “It’s designed for people who do awful things like cutting the brakes on a car,” he said. But a lack of options may have driven police to the charge, he added. The comparatively minor charges used previously were not deterring other climate activists taking similar actions. And under New Zealand law, there is no middle-ground offense. That’s because New Zealand has not followed in the steps of several countries trying to quell disruptive protests. In an increasingly global trend, state and federal governments across the U.S., U.K., Australia and Europe have passed legislation to tackle obstructive protest techniques. However, whether they work is yet to be seen—so far activists appear to have been emboldened by the changes. Find the story at the link in our bio, our Stories or the “Links to Latest Posts” highlight on our page. 📸: Restore Passenger Rail, Don Arnold/Getty Images, Lisa Maree Williams/Getty Images

layersDaily Sustainability Digest

Published about 23 minutes ago



The British Antarctic Survey’s £100m Discovery Building is a significant benchmark for sustainable construction, proving that sustainable building design, eco-design for buildings and low carbon design can perform in one of the world’s harshest environments. With the region’s first top BREEAM rating and a projected 25 per cent cut in site emissions, the scheme strengthens the case for whole life carbon, embodied carbon, whole life carbon assessment, lifecycle assessment and life cycle cost as core measures of environmental sustainability in construction. For teams targeting net zero carbon buildings, it shows that net zero whole life carbon depends on building lifecycle performance, energy-efficient buildings and tighter control of the carbon footprint of construction, including embodied carbon in materials.

The sharper risk in Britain is policy uncertainty over Biodiversity Net Gain for nationally significant infrastructure. Without detailed rules on land use, offsets and compliance, major schemes face delay and rising delivery risk just as sustainable design, circular economy in construction, green infrastructure and resource efficiency in construction are becoming standard expectations. Policy clarity now matters as much as engineering if the sector is to keep decarbonising the built environment and deliver credible low carbon building outcomes at scale.

Show More

camera_altFeatured Instagram Posts:

Get your opinion heard:

Whole Life Carbon is a platform for the entire construction industry—both in the UK and internationally. We track the latest publications, debates, and events related to whole life guidance and sustainability. If you have any enquiries or opinions to share, please do get in touch.

Let's chat!
Avatar

WLC Assistant

Ask me about sustainability

Hi! I'm your Whole Life Carbon assistant. I can help you learn about sustainability, carbon assessment, and navigate our resources. How can I help you today?