Every month, NASA scientists estimate Earth’s average global temperature from...

NASA Climate Change 1 year ago

Every month, NASA scientists estimate Earth’s average global temperature from measurements taken around the world. We release the data as the global temperature update. But what does it mean? 🌡️ ➡️Swipe for the breakdown. #ClimateChange #Temperature #EarthData #GlobalTemperature #Climate #NASA #Earth #NASAEarth Image Descriptions (1 of 2, continued in the comments): 1: On the right of the slide is the leftmost third of the global equal-area map of the July 2024 temperature anomaly relative to the July 1951-1980 mean. Most of the map is in shades of red, representing warmer than average temperatures. White arrows point to the map. On top is a black box with white text that reads: Each month NASA releases a global temperature update – but what does it mean? A color bar below the text shows how color on the map corresponds to temperature anomaly in degrees Celsius. 2: The background is the middle section of the global equal-area map of the July 2024 temperature anomaly relative to the July 1951-1980 mean. Most of the map is in shades of red, representing warmer than average temperatures. On top is a black box with white text that reads: Every month, NASA scientists estimate the average global temperature from measurements taken around the world. They use weather stations, ships, buoys, and other surface sensors. A photo in the bottom left corner shows a NOAA weather station and an animation in the upper right hand corner shows the locations of temperature measurements on a globe. 3: On the left is the right section of the global equal-area map of the July 2024 temperature anomaly relative to the July 1951-1980 mean. Most of the map is in shades of red, representing warmer than average temperatures. White text against a black background reads: Each month, the monthly global temperature is compared to the baseline average for that month. NASA uses the period from 1951-1980 as its baseline. A white arrow is pointing to the words baseline. The arrow is connected to a box with text that reads: Baseline: a long-term average used for comparison purposes. The color bar from slide 1 is at the top of the slide.

layersDaily Sustainability Digest

Published about 12 hours ago



A recent survey shows that most large businesses are failing to incorporate climate risks into new construction projects. This exposes developments to flood and extreme weather damage while undermining efforts to reach net zero Whole Life Carbon. Insurers are increasingly pressing for resilience planning, and the lack of a Whole Life Carbon Assessment in early project stages leaves significant risks unaddressed. Developers treating Embodied Carbon as a marginal issue face higher long-term costs rather than true Life Cycle Cost control.

Institutional capital is rapidly shifting towards sustainable construction, moving beyond climate risk debates to fund resilience and low carbon design. This trend is unlocking investment in sustainable building design and net zero carbon buildings, aligning financial flows with environmental sustainability in construction. For developers, demonstrating life cycle thinking in construction and proving reduced Embodied Carbon in materials is becoming critical to accessing large-scale finance.

The University of Derby has launched the Institute of Carbonomics to advance research in reducing emissions across industries. While broader in scope, the initiative is set to influence eco-design for buildings and sustainable architecture, embedding lifecycle assessment and sustainable building practices into commercial decision-making. Its outputs are expected to shape climate-smart construction by linking resource efficiency in construction to Whole Life Carbon reduction strategies.

Private investment momentum is also growing. Gresham House’s acquisition of clean energy investor SUSI Partners increases its capacity to fund green infrastructure, net zero carbon projects, and Circular Economy in construction approaches. This creates deeper capital pools for low carbon building technologies and renewable building materials, enabling more developers to pursue carbon neutral construction without prohibitive upfront costs.

Consumer demand reinforces this momentum. Rising energy costs are driving homeowners towards energy-efficient buildings and eco-friendly construction upgrades, accelerating adoption of green building products and smart retrofitting. For construction firms, this highlights a profitable pathway where sustainable building practices align with direct financial savings, embedding sustainable material specification as a market-driven necessity.

The “Nature in Contracts” initiative, supported by the UK Green Building Council, signals growing attention to biodiversity and the environmental impact of construction within procurement frameworks. By embedding nature-positive clauses, developers are being pushed towards circular construction strategies, sustainable urban development, and environmental product declarations (EPDs). This integration signals a future where green construction becomes inseparable from legal and financial compliance, sharpening the focus on Embodied Carbon in materials and building lifecycle performance.

Show More

camera_altFeatured Instagram Posts:

Get your opinion heard:

Whole Life Carbon is a platform for the entire construction industry—both in the UK and internationally. We track the latest publications, debates, and events related to whole life guidance and sustainability. If you have any enquiries or opinions to share, please do get in touch.