Environmental groups and some residents who live in the Bull Mountains sued the...

Inside Climate News 1 month ago

Environmental groups and some residents who live in the Bull Mountains sued the Trump administration to prevent Signal Peak Energy’s Bull Mountains Mine from expanding, stating that the “energy emergency” underpinning its revival is nonexistent. The plaintiffs claim that regulators have known for decades that underground coal mining would damage the area’s water forever. “The landscape, something that wildlife and people relied upon, that’s just no longer there. There’s really significant protections for water. It’s pretty clear that the mine and the [Montana Department of Environmental Quality] are not living up to those standards,” said Derf Johnson, deputy director of the Montana Environmental Information Center. The legal action comes as locals in Musselshell County, where the mine is primarily located, have been openly, and sometimes bitterly, debating how to build an economy that will outlast the mine. Musselshell County commissioners, none of whom want to see the mine close but also don’t want to have their tax revenue from it decline, say such talk has been met with opposition from Signal Peak Energy executives. “There’s this perception that unless you give the mine favorable taxation conditions, you somehow are against it,” said Robert Pancratz, a Musselshell County commissioner. 🔗 Read more on our website, linked in our bio ✍️ @jakebolster

layersDaily Sustainability Digest

Published about 2 days ago



UKGBC’s latest message is that sustainable construction will be won through retrofit, operational optimisation and tougher evidence, not through glossy replacement schemes. Upgrading existing commercial assets with low carbon design, better fabric and smarter controls is emerging as the most credible route to decarbonising the built environment, cutting the carbon footprint of construction and improving building lifecycle performance. That places whole life carbon, embodied carbon and a robust whole life carbon assessment at the centre of investment decisions, where life cycle cost, lifecycle assessment and measurable operational outcomes now matter as much as design intent. Sustainable building design is becoming a test of commercial resilience, with net zero carbon buildings judged on verified performance rather than net zero carbon claims alone.

Proposed changes to GHG Protocol scope 3 reporting are set to intensify scrutiny of embodied carbon in materials, supply-chain transparency and the environmental impact of construction. Developers, contractors and manufacturers will face growing pressure to use low carbon construction materials, low embodied carbon materials and environmental product declarations (EPDs) to prove carbon footprint reduction and resource efficiency in construction. This is pushing environmental sustainability in construction towards circular economy in construction, circular construction strategies and end-of-life reuse in construction, with greater value placed on sustainable material specification, green building materials and renewable building materials. For the market, the direction is clear: eco-design for buildings, sustainable design and sustainable building practices must deliver net zero whole life carbon outcomes, with BREEAM and BREEAM v7 likely to gain further relevance as benchmarks for green construction, eco-friendly construction and low carbon building performance.

Show More

camera_altFeatured Instagram Posts:

Get your opinion heard:

Whole Life Carbon is a platform for the entire construction industry—both in the UK and internationally. We track the latest publications, debates, and events related to whole life guidance and sustainability. If you have any enquiries or opinions to share, please do get in touch.

Let's chat!
Avatar

WLC Assistant

Ask me about sustainability

Hi! I'm your Whole Life Carbon assistant. I can help you learn about sustainability, carbon assessment, and navigate our resources. How can I help you today?