Did you know Gary Anderson designed the ♻️ in 1969 for a design competition to promote cardboard’s reusable properties? The iconic symbol is now predominantly used as a “resin identifier” — just telling you what kind of plastic the item is made from. The symbol is so misunderstood that California has banned its use on things that aren’t even recyclable.
But how did we get here?
The design was widely adopted as a symbol for recycling, although never trademarked or established as a true mark of authenticity. People think it means something sustainable but the symbol isn’t really regulated and companies have taken advantage of that. In 1989, oil and plastics executives began a quiet campaign for the symbol to appear on all plastic — making it look recyclable, even if that wasn’t possible. The symbol appearing on all plastics greenwashed the material, making consumers believe that they didn’t have to worry about the waste while encouraging them to keep buying new things.
The truth is, we should reduce our use of plastic even though it’s hard to avoid plastic completely. If you want to recycle correctly, knowing these numbers is important. Remember that what can be recycled depends on individual cities’ programs, always double check what can go in your recycling bin. Typically the best bet is to only put numbers 1 and 2 into the bin (and no plastic bags, plastic wrap / wrappers, or things just coated in plastic).
Source: “The History of Plastic: The Theft Of The Recycling Symbol” by Rudy Sanchez for The Dieline & “Trash or Recycling? Why Plastic Keeps Us Guessing” by By Winston Choi-Schagrin and Hiroko Tabuchi for The New York Times
Design by @bymatthewmiller research by @aveiary for @futureearth
Technological innovation in sustainable construction is accelerating as global decarbonisation targets grow more urgent. The UK’s Sizewell C nuclear project has secured financial close, reinforcing the integration of low‑carbon energy infrastructure into long‑term national planning and supporting net zero whole life carbon ambitions. Nuclear power remains debated, yet its role in reducing the carbon footprint of construction highlights the importance of reliable clean energy for delivering net zero carbon buildings and low carbon design strategies.
The Environmental Services Association’s proposal to expand energy‑from‑waste plants within urban heat networks illustrates how circular economy in construction principles are advancing. Converting waste output into district heating aligns with circular construction strategies that prioritise resource efficiency in construction and end‑of‑life reuse in construction, turning linear waste streams into carbon‑neutral infrastructure.
Operational shifts such as Sunbelt Rentals’ move to all‑electric depots demonstrate how whole life carbon assessment frameworks are shaping business models. Electrifying high‑energy‑use depots reveals practical progress in reducing embodied carbon and embodied carbon in materials, marking a step toward eco‑friendly construction and broader environmental sustainability in construction. Such initiatives reflect how sustainable building design and sustainable material specification now influence every stage of the building lifecycle performance.
Capital markets are responding with unprecedented commitment to sustainable infrastructure. Global transition‑finance funds have reached $644 billion, signalling growing investor confidence in whole life carbon evaluation, lifecycle assessment, and life cycle cost analysis. Yet delivery depends on regulatory certainty that embeds low carbon building requirements and BREEAM v7 standards into planning systems.
A paradigm shift is underway where climate resilience, sustainable design, and environmental product declarations (EPDs) define the baseline for sustainable building practices. Meeting the scale of change required will rely on accelerating eco‑design for buildings, advancing low carbon construction materials, and achieving measurable carbon footprint reduction across every asset class. The sustainability of the built environment now rests on how decisively policymakers, developers, and engineers decarbonise the systems that construct it.
Whole Life Carbon is a platform for the entire construction industry—both in the UK and internationally. We track the latest publications, debates, and events related to whole life guidance and sustainability. If you have any enquiries or opinions to share, please do
get in touch.