Did you know Gary Anderson designed the ♻️ in 1969 for a design competition...

Future Earth 3 years ago

Did you know Gary Anderson designed the ♻️ in 1969 for a design competition to promote cardboard’s reusable properties? The iconic symbol is now predominantly used as a “resin identifier” — just telling you what kind of plastic the item is made from. The symbol is so misunderstood that California has banned its use on things that aren’t even recyclable. But how did we get here? The design was widely adopted as a symbol for recycling, although never trademarked or established as a true mark of authenticity. People think it means something sustainable but the symbol isn’t really regulated and companies have taken advantage of that. In 1989, oil and plastics executives began a quiet campaign for the symbol to appear on all plastic — making it look recyclable, even if that wasn’t possible. The symbol appearing on all plastics greenwashed the material, making consumers believe that they didn’t have to worry about the waste while encouraging them to keep buying new things. The truth is, we should reduce our use of plastic even though it’s hard to avoid plastic completely. If you want to recycle correctly, knowing these numbers is important. Remember that what can be recycled depends on individual cities’ programs, always double check what can go in your recycling bin. Typically the best bet is to only put numbers 1 and 2 into the bin (and no plastic bags, plastic wrap / wrappers, or things just coated in plastic). Source: “The History of Plastic: The Theft Of The Recycling Symbol” by Rudy Sanchez for The Dieline & “Trash or Recycling? Why Plastic Keeps Us Guessing” by By Winston Choi-Schagrin and Hiroko Tabuchi for The New York Times Design by @bymatthewmiller research by @aveiary for @futureearth

layersDaily Sustainability Digest

Published about 3 hours ago



Sustainable construction is moving beyond operational energy towards whole life carbon, embodied carbon and the harder-to-measure risks locked into land, materials, waste and regulation.

New WRI research estimating 3.9bn tonnes of annual carbon emissions from disturbed, drained or burned soils underlines why site preparation, drainage and earthworks must be treated as core climate decisions within whole life carbon assessment, lifecycle assessment and life cycle cost planning.

Soil carbon loss now sits squarely within the carbon footprint of construction and should shape low carbon design, sustainable building design and environmental sustainability in construction.

Regulatory pressure is also building around chemicals and waste. The UK Health Security Agency’s investigation into PFAS exposure has direct implications for green building products, coatings, sealants, membranes and water-resistant systems used across construction supply chains. Sustainable material specification will need stronger evidence, including environmental product declarations (EPDs), scrutiny of embodied carbon in materials and clearer controls on hazardous substances. The Environment Agency’s limited use of enhanced powers for unlimited civil fines on waste offences exposes a gap between policy ambition and enforcement, but construction, one of the UK’s largest waste producers, should expect tougher expectations on resource efficiency in construction, end-of-life reuse in construction and circular economy in construction.

Market consolidation in recycling, including Biffa’s acquisition of Enva’s general recycling operations, signals rising demand for traceable recovery routes and circular construction strategies. Digital and offsite construction are also advancing from promise to delivery, with fully configured volumetric modules costed through to factory production. This supports low-impact construction, carbon footprint reduction and building lifecycle performance by cutting waste, rework and unnecessary material use.

Grid expansion remains essential, but net zero carbon buildings will depend on flexible demand, heat networks, storage, smart controls and energy-efficient buildings that use clean power intelligently. Net zero whole life carbon is becoming a systems challenge rather than a product claim. The future of sustainable building practices, eco-design for buildings and green infrastructure will be judged by measurable performance across soil carbon, low embodied carbon materials, chemistry, waste and real-time energy use. Green construction must now prove it can deliver genuine decarbonising the built environment outcomes, not simply market eco-friendly construction as an aspiration.

Show More

camera_altFeatured Instagram Posts:

Get your opinion heard:

Whole Life Carbon is a platform for the entire construction industry—both in the UK and internationally. We track the latest publications, debates, and events related to whole life guidance and sustainability. If you have any enquiries or opinions to share, please do get in touch.

Let's chat!
Avatar

WLC Assistant

Ask me about sustainability

Hi! I'm your Whole Life Carbon assistant. I can help you learn about sustainability, carbon assessment, and navigate our resources. How can I help you today?