Did you know Gary Anderson designed the ♻️ in 1969 for a design competition...

Future Earth 2 years ago

Did you know Gary Anderson designed the ♻️ in 1969 for a design competition to promote cardboard’s reusable properties? The iconic symbol is now predominantly used as a “resin identifier” — just telling you what kind of plastic the item is made from. The symbol is so misunderstood that California has banned its use on things that aren’t even recyclable. But how did we get here? The design was widely adopted as a symbol for recycling, although never trademarked or established as a true mark of authenticity. People think it means something sustainable but the symbol isn’t really regulated and companies have taken advantage of that. In 1989, oil and plastics executives began a quiet campaign for the symbol to appear on all plastic — making it look recyclable, even if that wasn’t possible. The symbol appearing on all plastics greenwashed the material, making consumers believe that they didn’t have to worry about the waste while encouraging them to keep buying new things. The truth is, we should reduce our use of plastic even though it’s hard to avoid plastic completely. If you want to recycle correctly, knowing these numbers is important. Remember that what can be recycled depends on individual cities’ programs, always double check what can go in your recycling bin. Typically the best bet is to only put numbers 1 and 2 into the bin (and no plastic bags, plastic wrap / wrappers, or things just coated in plastic). Source: “The History of Plastic: The Theft Of The Recycling Symbol” by Rudy Sanchez for The Dieline & “Trash or Recycling? Why Plastic Keeps Us Guessing” by By Winston Choi-Schagrin and Hiroko Tabuchi for The New York Times Design by @bymatthewmiller research by @aveiary for @futureearth

layersDaily Sustainability Digest

Published about 16 hours ago



Water is emerging as the critical constraint shaping sustainable construction and urban development. A United Nations warning of “water bankruptcy” positions scarcity as a core determinant of sustainable building design, forcing developers to integrate hydrological data into every feasibility study. Growth strategies in arid regions are now being rebuilt around circular economy in construction principles—combining closed-loop water systems, onsite reuse, and lifecycle assessment to ensure resilience in resource-constrained environments. The shift highlights the rise of life cycle thinking in construction, where water efficiency aligns with carbon footprint reduction and long-term life cycle cost outcomes.

Reconstruction in disaster-prone areas is demanding a redefinition of sustainable building practices. Indian townships rebuilding after landslides demonstrate the limits of traditional resilience models. A data-driven approach grounded in environmental sustainability in construction is replacing reactive rebuilding with preventative planning. Projects now value green infrastructure and community-led hazard mitigation as core performance indicators, embedding end-of-life reuse in construction and low-impact construction techniques as benchmarks for sustainable design.

The fragmented global energy transition continues to disrupt the carbon footprint of construction. As the embodied carbon of steel, cement and modular components depends heavily on place of manufacture, procurement teams are pursuing environmental product declarations (EPDs) and low embodied carbon materials to manage embodied carbon in materials more transparently. Contracts increasingly price carbon volatility alongside inflation and currency risk. Design professionals are under growing pressure to evidence net zero whole life carbon performance through rigorous whole life carbon assessment and life cycle cost modelling. This progression marks the industry’s deeper commitment to decarbonising the built environment and achieving carbon neutral construction.

Corporate investment is translating ambition into deliverable outcomes. Housing and workplace projects benchmarked against BREEAM V7 and net zero carbon buildings standards are demonstrating measurable improvements in green construction efficiency, renewable building materials integration and circular construction strategies. The distinction between retrofit and replacement is being framed by whole life carbon considerations and building lifecycle performance metrics. Each project is an applied case study in sustainable material specification and eco-design for buildings, proving that low carbon design and resource efficiency in construction are now commercially viable rather than aspirational.

Sustainable construction is no longer an environmental choice but an operational necessity. The convergence of water scarcity, embodied carbon accountability and resilience-based planning ensures that sustainable building design now serves as the foundation for both climate adaptation and long-term asset value.

Show More

camera_altFeatured Instagram Posts:

Get your opinion heard:

Whole Life Carbon is a platform for the entire construction industry—both in the UK and internationally. We track the latest publications, debates, and events related to whole life guidance and sustainability. If you have any enquiries or opinions to share, please do get in touch.

Let's chat!
Avatar

WLC Assistant

Ask me about sustainability

Hi! I'm your Whole Life Carbon assistant. I can help you learn about sustainability, carbon assessment, and navigate our resources. How can I help you today?