This Statistical Guideline aims to address the lack of a detailed, globally agreed statistical methodology for measuring plastic flows at the national, regional, and global levels. It provides guidance to practitioners on producing high-quality national-level statistics on plastics that are comparable across countries. With the continued increase in the production and consumption of plastics in recent decades, combined with a predominantly linear plastic economy and insufficient waste management, plastic pollution has become a global concern. Monitoring this issue is therefore essential. At the same time, producing statistics on plastics across the entire life cycle presents multiple challenges. Clear scoping and consistent definitions of plastics across society are necessary to support the development of robust statistics. Experts from the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR), in collaboration and consultation with experts from other international organisations, national statistical offices, relevant ministries, academia, research institutes, and other entities of UN Member States, have developed the Statistical Guideline for Measuring Flows of Plastic throughout the Life Cycle. The Guideline proposes the boundaries of the plastic life cycle, defines key terms and concepts, and details the main elements for accounting for the production, trade, consumption, and waste of plastics. In developing the Statistical Guideline have been developed aligning to internationally agreed statistical standards, classifications, methodologies, and available data sources, with the aim of presenting a comprehensive picture of plastic flows throughout the life cycle. The Guideline is intended to provide substantial support to statistical offices and other relevant organisations responsible for producing statistics on plastics at the national, regional, and global levels. This Statistical Guideline represents a first step in addressing the absence of a detailed, globally agreed methodology for measuring plastic flows. Some aspects may require further discussion and refinement in future versions. Its application by statisticians and other relevant experts at the national level is expected to result in high-quality statistics on plastics that are comparable across national, regional, and global levels. These statistics will, in turn, support policymaking on strategically important issues, including, but not limited to, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, the circular economy, national source inventories on plastics, and plastic waste management.
The sustainable construction agenda is being tested by climate risk, evidence quality and the delivery of public assets that perform over their full lifespan. Satellite data from the Nepalese Himalayas shows almost 300,000 people living in flood-prone valleys where roads, settlements and infrastructure are expanding into areas exposed to flooding and landslides. The finding underlines the environmental impact of construction when sustainable urban development, green infrastructure and climate adaptation are not embedded at the earliest planning stage. Resilience begins with land use, not late-stage mitigation.
The completion of a net zero primary school in Canterbury shows how low carbon design can move from ambition to procurement. Education estates offer a practical route for net zero carbon buildings because standardised briefs, long operating lives and constrained budgets force discipline around sustainable building design, energy-efficient buildings and building lifecycle performance. The project strengthens the case for whole life carbon assessment, life cycle cost analysis and lifecycle assessment as routine tools for public-sector delivery, rather than optional sustainability exercises.
Market signals are becoming tougher for green construction claims. Investor confidence in ESG data quality is weakening, while higher-rated carbon credits are attracting clearer price premiums. Developers, contractors and clients now face rising expectations to evidence whole life carbon, embodied carbon, net zero whole life carbon and the carbon footprint of construction with credible data. Environmental product declarations (EPDs), sustainable material specification, low embodied carbon materials and transparent reporting on embodied carbon in materials will carry increasing weight.
The direction of travel is clear: sustainable building practices must combine eco-design for buildings, low carbon construction materials, circular economy principles and resource efficiency in construction. BREEAM, BREEAM v7 and comparable frameworks will matter most where they support measurable carbon footprint reduction, circular construction strategies, end-of-life reuse in construction and genuine decarbonising the built environment. Vague claims around eco-friendly construction, green building materials, renewable building materials or carbon neutral construction will struggle unless they are backed by robust proof across design, procurement, operation and reuse.
Whole Life Carbon is a platform for the entire construction industry—both in the UK and internationally. We track the latest publications, debates, and events related to whole life guidance and sustainability. If you have any enquiries or opinions to share, please do
get in touch.
Let's chat!
WLC Assistant
Ask me about sustainability
Hi! I'm your Whole Life Carbon assistant. I can help you learn about sustainability, carbon assessment, and navigate our resources. How can I help you today?