Mid-term Status on SDG 6 Indicators: 6.3.2, 6.5.1, & 6.6.1 (2024)

United Nations 1 year ago

Water is vital to human and planetary health and the internationally agreed goals that back it, including the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, the Sendai Framework and the Paris Agreement. Yet the triple planetary crisis – the crisis of climate change, nature and biodiversity loss and pollution and waste – is affecting the availability, distribution, quality and quantity of water. Despite water being essential for human health, food security, energy supplies, sustaining cities, and ecosystems and on the front lines of the triple planetary crisis of climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution, SDG 6 is alarmingly off-track. For most of the SDG 6 Indicators, the current rate of progress is not fast enough to close the gap before 2030. In some cases, progress is even relapsing. The new mid-term status reports for SDG 6 indicators: 6.3.2, 6.5.1, and 6.6.1 found that if the priorities under SDG 6 are to be achieved by 2030, action on these indicators needs to be accelerated four times faster. These priorities can be ensured if adequate investments are made towards institutions, infrastructure, information, and innovation, where concerted action and institutional coherence is required, and new ideas, tools, and solutions are developed that draw from existing knowledge and indigenous practices. Working with partners within the framework of the UN-Water led Integrated Monitoring Initiative for SDG 6, UNEP officially launched reports, in August 2021, on the three SDG 6 indicators for which it is custodian. These indicator reports are: SDG 6.3.2 – Progress on Ambient Water Quality with a special focus on Health SDG 6.5.1 – Progress on the Implementation of Integrated Water Resources Management with special focus on Climate Change SDG 6.6.1 – Progress on Water-related Ecosystems with a special focus on Biodiversity A key underlying message from these reports is that existing efforts to protect and restore water-related ecosystems must be urgently scaled up and accelerated. Progress Reports can also be found on UN-Water's SDG 6 Progress Reports page
→ View Full Article

layersDaily Sustainability Digest

Published about 7 hours ago



Government proposals for a unified UK construction regulator mark a significant shift toward environmental sustainability in construction. By integrating safety, product standards and net zero carbon performance, policy alignment could strengthen sustainable building design and accelerate the transition to net zero carbon buildings. The move is expected to push developers toward rigorous whole life carbon assessment, transparent lifecycle assessment and greater focus on embodied carbon in materials. Yet, the diversion of National Wealth Fund and clean‑tech R&D budgets threatens investment in renewable building materials, low carbon construction materials and digital design innovations essential for achieving carbon footprint reduction.

Approval of the Five Estuaries offshore wind expansion reinforces clean power supply crucial to energy‑efficient buildings and sustainable building practices. Electrification strategies depend on a greener grid to reduce the carbon footprint of construction and advance low carbon design principles inherent in sustainable construction. Rising annual temperatures, confirmed by the Met Office, demand eco‑design for buildings resilient to overheating, flood and drought. Government flood taskforce initiatives must complement broader circular construction strategies, ensuring that adaptation spending matches increasing risk.

Exposed flaws in carbon offsetting schemes have intensified scrutiny over carbon neutral construction claims. Developers are shifting from questionable credits toward verifiable on‑site reductions through whole life carbon strategies, improved building lifecycle performance and sustainable material specification supported by environmental product declarations (EPDs). Economic realism and life cycle cost assessment are becoming central to sustainable design, ensuring that embodied carbon metrics translate into genuine impact rather than accounting artefacts.

International developments strengthen this trajectory. Legal challenges to inadequate climate action, such as in Japan, reinforce the global imperative for decarbonising the built environment. Hong Kong’s restrictions on volatile organic compounds signal emerging benchmarks for green building materials and eco‑friendly construction. Attempts to close climate research centres risk undermining data vital for BREEAM v7 certification, circular economy in construction analysis and life cycle thinking in construction. Reliable research infrastructure underpins net zero whole life carbon targets, supporting broader sustainability goals across the global built environment.

Show More

camera_altFeatured Instagram Posts:

Get your opinion heard:

Whole Life Carbon is a platform for the entire construction industry—both in the UK and internationally. We track the latest publications, debates, and events related to whole life guidance and sustainability. If you have any enquiries or opinions to share, please do get in touch.

eco

WLC Assistant

Ask me about sustainability

Hi! I'm your Whole Life Carbon assistant. I can help you learn about sustainability, carbon assessment, and navigate our resources. How can I help you today?