Mid-term Status on SDG 6 Indicators: 6.3.2, 6.5.1, & 6.6.1 (2024)

United Nations 2 years ago

Water is vital to human and planetary health and the internationally agreed goals that back it, including the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, the Sendai Framework and the Paris Agreement. Yet the triple planetary crisis – the crisis of climate change, nature and biodiversity loss and pollution and waste – is affecting the availability, distribution, quality and quantity of water. Despite water being essential for human health, food security, energy supplies, sustaining cities, and ecosystems and on the front lines of the triple planetary crisis of climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution, SDG 6 is alarmingly off-track. For most of the SDG 6 Indicators, the current rate of progress is not fast enough to close the gap before 2030. In some cases, progress is even relapsing. The new mid-term status reports for SDG 6 indicators: 6.3.2, 6.5.1, and 6.6.1 found that if the priorities under SDG 6 are to be achieved by 2030, action on these indicators needs to be accelerated four times faster. These priorities can be ensured if adequate investments are made towards institutions, infrastructure, information, and innovation, where concerted action and institutional coherence is required, and new ideas, tools, and solutions are developed that draw from existing knowledge and indigenous practices. Working with partners within the framework of the UN-Water led Integrated Monitoring Initiative for SDG 6, UNEP officially launched reports, in August 2021, on the three SDG 6 indicators for which it is custodian. These indicator reports are: SDG 6.3.2 – Progress on Ambient Water Quality with a special focus on Health SDG 6.5.1 – Progress on the Implementation of Integrated Water Resources Management with special focus on Climate Change SDG 6.6.1 – Progress on Water-related Ecosystems with a special focus on Biodiversity A key underlying message from these reports is that existing efforts to protect and restore water-related ecosystems must be urgently scaled up and accelerated. Progress Reports can also be found on UN-Water's SDG 6 Progress Reports page
→ View Full Article

layersDaily Sustainability Digest

Published about 1 hour ago



Sustainable construction is being reshaped by the convergence of decarbonisation, land use, digital infrastructure and tougher carbon accounting. The rapid growth of AI data centres in Britain is now a major built-environment challenge, with large schemes demanding exceptional power, water and grid capacity. Drax’s proposed £20bn gigawatt-scale data-centre project at a biomass power plant highlights the need for whole life carbon assessment, credible renewable energy procurement, heat reuse and demand management if strategic infrastructure is to support net zero carbon rather than undermine it.

New research estimating that disturbed soils emit 3.9bn tonnes of carbon a year widens the scope of embodied carbon scrutiny. Developers and contractors can no longer focus solely on embodied carbon in materials such as steel and concrete. Excavation, drainage and burning can turn soil into a major emissions source, increasing the carbon footprint of construction and strengthening the case for low-impact construction, sustainable building practices and tighter site-level lifecycle assessment. Soil protection should become central to sustainable building design, environmental sustainability in construction and planning policy alongside biodiversity net gain.

The UK’s proposed waste-crime crackdown is highly relevant to green construction because illegal disposal, poor aggregates recovery and weak material traceability undermine the circular economy in construction. Strong enforcement could support resource efficiency in construction, end-of-life reuse in construction and circular construction strategies, provided regulators address the commercial incentives that make waste crime attractive. Better material tracking, environmental product declarations (EPDs) and sustainable material specification will be essential to reducing risk and improving building lifecycle performance.

Digital construction and volumetric systems are moving closer to practical delivery, with platforms offering configured and costed modules ready for factory production. These tools can support low carbon design, reduce waste, improve quality control and give project teams clearer data on life cycle cost, embodied carbon and operational performance. Their value lies in connecting design, procurement and manufacturing so that net zero carbon buildings, net zero whole life carbon targets and carbon footprint reduction become measurable outcomes rather than aspirations.

The direction of travel is clear: whole life carbon, lifecycle assessment and life cycle thinking in construction are becoming fundamental to sustainable architecture and low carbon building delivery. BREEAM, BREEAM V7 and other performance frameworks will need to reflect a broader understanding of environmental impact of construction, from low embodied carbon materials and green building products to land disturbance, grid stress and circular economy performance. Decarbonising the built environment now depends on integrating eco-design for buildings, renewable building materials, green infrastructure and durable policy into every stage of planning, construction and operation.

Show More

camera_altFeatured Instagram Posts:

Get your opinion heard:

Whole Life Carbon is a platform for the entire construction industry—both in the UK and internationally. We track the latest publications, debates, and events related to whole life guidance and sustainability. If you have any enquiries or opinions to share, please do get in touch.

Let's chat!
Avatar

WLC Assistant

Ask me about sustainability

Hi! I'm your Whole Life Carbon assistant. I can help you learn about sustainability, carbon assessment, and navigate our resources. How can I help you today?