Green and Sustainable Chemistry

United Nations 10 months ago

The information found within this e-course builds on UNEP's Green and Sustainable Chemistry Framework Manual. The e-course was developed by UNEP in collaboration with UNITAR, in consultation with experts from industry, academia, government, international organizations and NGO’s. The overall aim of the e-course is to unveil the full potential of chemistry such that it is compatible with, and supports, the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. It aims to teach learners “what” Green and Sustainable Chemistry is, “why” it is needed, “what” it aims to achieve and “how” stakeholders can achieve a transformation towards its underlying vision. The course is targeted at national chemicals officials and education institutions but does not require specialised chemical knowledge and is intended to be of interest to a broad range of sectors and stakeholders along the chemical value chain from chemicals design, production and use to final disposal. After taking the course, participants will be able to: Understand what Green and Sustainable Chemistry is. Describe the 10 Objectives and Guiding Considerations for Green and Sustainable Chemistry. Understand the roles different stakeholders can play to advance Green and Sustainable Chemistry. Discuss how educators can advance Green and Sustainable Chemistry. Understand the links between chemistry and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and how the 10 Objectives can advance circularity. Explain the potential of Green and Sustainable Chemistry to drive sustainability in different sectors of the economy. Describe key policies, tools and instruments that can be used to foster an enabling environment for Green and Sustainable Chemistry. Understand the importance of metrics and reporting for monitoring and measuring impact.
→ View Full Article

layersDaily Sustainability Digest

Published about 12 hours ago



Britain’s sustainable construction agenda is being reshaped by two tests: whether major infrastructure can prove credible whole life carbon performance, and whether public investment can protect communities from escalating climate risk. The Climate Change Committee’s warning that Heathrow’s third runway has “no credible pathway” within current climate policy unless aviation pays for genuinely cleaner flying signals a tougher consent environment for carbon-intensive projects.

For contractors, planners and financiers, whole life carbon assessment, embodied carbon evidence and robust lifecycle assessment are becoming central to project viability, not optional sustainability credentials. The decision strengthens scrutiny of the carbon footprint of construction across long-lived infrastructure, particularly where business cases rely on future decarbonisation rather than verified low carbon design today. It also raises the importance of life cycle cost, net zero carbon alignment and net zero whole life carbon claims in planning, procurement and investment decisions. Projects unable to demonstrate carbon footprint reduction, credible mitigation and environmental sustainability in construction will face greater policy, reputational and financial risk.

The Environment Agency’s appointment of GRAHAM to deliver the Oxford Flood Alleviation Scheme points to a more defensible direction for public infrastructure spending. Designed to protect properties along the Thames corridor and avoid more than £1.8bn in flood damage, the scheme frames green infrastructure as asset protection, climate resilience and sustainable urban development. It shows how sustainable building practices and low-impact construction can support public value when they reduce physical climate exposure and long-term economic losses.

The emerging priority is no longer green construction branding alone. Sustainable building design, sustainable design and eco-design for buildings must now be judged against whole life carbon, embodied carbon in materials, building lifecycle performance and resource efficiency in construction. The same pressure is driving demand for low carbon construction materials, low embodied carbon materials, renewable building materials, green building materials and transparent environmental product declarations (EPDs).

BREEAM, BREEAM v7 and similar frameworks are likely to gain significance as clients seek measurable evidence for net zero carbon buildings, energy-efficient buildings and low carbon building outcomes. Circular economy principles, circular economy in construction, circular construction strategies and end-of-life reuse in construction will become more important as the sector addresses the environmental impact of construction and accelerates decarbonising the built environment.

Sustainable construction is becoming a discipline of hard choices: what should be built, what must be defended, how climate resilience is funded, and whether optimistic emissions assumptions can survive regulatory scrutiny. Green concrete and carbon neutral construction may become increasingly credible through better sustainable material specification and green building products. Green airports remain a harder proposition under a planning system moving towards life cycle thinking in construction and evidence-led environmental accountability.

Show More

camera_altFeatured Instagram Posts:

Get your opinion heard:

Whole Life Carbon is a platform for the entire construction industry—both in the UK and internationally. We track the latest publications, debates, and events related to whole life guidance and sustainability. If you have any enquiries or opinions to share, please do get in touch.

Let's chat!
Avatar

WLC Assistant

Ask me about sustainability

Hi! I'm your Whole Life Carbon assistant. I can help you learn about sustainability, carbon assessment, and navigate our resources. How can I help you today?