Extended Producer Responsibility frameworks are directing materials towards recycling rather than higher-value reuse and repair, according to a new policy brief from the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, which calls for stronger fee incentives and clearer regulation to support circular economy goals. Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) schemes are failing to prioritise reuse and remanufacturing, despite their potential to retain greater economic and environmental value than recycling, according to a new policy brief published by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMF). The briefing argues that while EPR systems generate dedicated funding for managing products at end of life, current fee structures largely
Severe Himalayan flooding exposed systemic infrastructure risk, cutting Nepal’s hydropower output by more than a tenth and confirming that resilience is fundamental to sustainable construction and environmental sustainability in construction.
Catchment-scale planning, diversified energy portfolios and redundancy in critical systems must sit alongside siting, access and social equity to keep projects viable. Policy momentum is shifting toward integrating adaptation into core planning, with procurement and finance required to price climate risk across whole asset lives through whole life carbon assessment, lifecycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis.
Targets for whole life carbon and embodied carbon should be locked into briefs and contracts, with BREEAM and BREEAM v7 used to embed building lifecycle performance, life cycle thinking in construction and sustainable building design.
Reconstruction that embraces green infrastructure, nature-based buffers and community-led recovery can avoid the “build–break–rebuild” loop. Circular economy in construction, circular construction strategies and end-of-life reuse in construction should guide material choices, supported by environmental product declarations (EPDs), sustainable material specification and low embodied carbon materials to cut the carbon footprint of construction. Eco-design for buildings, low carbon design and resource efficiency in construction are now baseline for energy-efficient buildings, green construction and eco-friendly construction.
US safety clearance for a mile‑deep nuclear reactor design signals decentralised, climate-resilient, low‑carbon power for energy‑intensive cement and steel, hardening supply for data‑rich construction workflows. Reliable clean baseload can accelerate decarbonising the built environment, enable net zero carbon buildings and net zero whole life carbon pathways, support carbon neutral construction and deliver measurable carbon footprint reduction with renewable building materials and green building materials in low carbon building programmes.
Whole Life Carbon is a platform for the entire construction industry—both in the UK and internationally. We track the latest publications, debates, and events related to whole life guidance and sustainability. If you have any enquiries or opinions to share, please do
get in touch.
Let's chat!
WLC Assistant
Ask me about sustainability
Hi! I'm your Whole Life Carbon assistant. I can help you learn about sustainability, carbon assessment, and navigate our resources. How can I help you today?
