EPR schemes falling short on reuse as recycling dominates policy focus, Ellen MacArthur Foundation warns

Circular Online 25 days ago

Extended Producer Responsibility frameworks are directing materials towards recycling rather than higher-value reuse and repair, according to a new policy brief from the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, which calls for stronger fee incentives and clearer regulation to support circular economy goals. Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) schemes are failing to prioritise reuse and remanufacturing, despite their potential to retain greater economic and environmental value than recycling, according to a new policy brief published by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMF). The briefing argues that while EPR systems generate dedicated funding for managing products at end of life, current fee structures largely
→ View Full Article

layersDaily Sustainability Digest

Published about 3 hours ago



The nexus of sustainable construction is undergoing a structural realignment driven by regulation, finance and transparent data. China has introduced its first national climate disclosure standard requiring developers, contractors and material producers to publish comparable embodied carbon and whole life carbon data. This anchors environmental sustainability in construction to measurable performance and strengthens accountability across global supply chains. Investors are accelerating the transition as asset owners controlling $127 trillion demand CDP‑grade environmental reporting and the UK’s investment advisory sector embeds whole life carbon assessment and life cycle cost metrics into due diligence.

Capital allocation is reshaping risk. Standard Chartered’s €1 billion green bond dedicated to green construction and circular economy projects confirms that financial institutions now view low carbon design and sustainable building design as credit determinants. Within project delivery, circular economy in construction principles are becoming procurement norms. Persimmon’s digital platform for reclaimed renewable building materials demonstrates a scalable model for end‑of‑life reuse in construction where low embodied carbon materials, traceability and sustainable material specification are prerequisites for compliance and building lifecycle performance.

Successful firms are embedding life cycle thinking in construction with verifiable lifecycle assessments and environmental product declarations (EPDs) that align with both investor frameworks and emerging Chinese disclosure rules. Organisations quantifying the carbon footprint of construction through whole life carbon assessment reporting gain competitive advantage via cheaper finance and preferred‑bidder status. Those failing to adopt circular construction strategies or demonstrate carbon footprint reduction face exclusion from net zero carbon portfolios, planning uncertainty and tightening breeam or breeam v7 criteria.

The momentum toward net zero whole life carbon and carbon neutral construction marks a decisive turn where eco‑friendly construction and sustainable building practices define both market access and investor confidence.

Show More

camera_altFeatured Instagram Posts:

Get your opinion heard:

Whole Life Carbon is a platform for the entire construction industry—both in the UK and internationally. We track the latest publications, debates, and events related to whole life guidance and sustainability. If you have any enquiries or opinions to share, please do get in touch.

eco

WLC Assistant

Ask me about sustainability

Hi! I'm your Whole Life Carbon assistant. I can help you learn about sustainability, carbon assessment, and navigate our resources. How can I help you today?